We have talked about the different statistical models investors can use to judge whether to invest in an early-stage startup.
One common mathematical model that investors use to judge whether to invest in a startup is the net present value (NPV) model. This model estimates the value of an investment based on the expected cash flows that the investment will generate over time, discounted to the present using a required rate of return.
Here's how the NPV model works:
If the NPV is positive, it means that the expected cash flows are expected to exceed the initial investment cost, and the investment is likely to be profitable. If the NPV is negative, it means that the expected cash flows are not sufficient to cover the initial investment cost, and the investment is likely to be unprofitable.
For example, suppose that an investor is considering investing $100,000 in a startup that is expected to generate $30,000 in profits each year for the next 5 years. The required rate of return is 10%. Using the NPV model, the present value of the expected cash flows would be:
$30,000 / (1 + 0.10)^1 + $30,000 / (1 + 0.10)^2 + $30,000 / (1 + 0.10)^3 + $30,000 / (1 + 0.10)^4 + $30,000 / (1 + 0.10)^5 = $104,973.47
The NPV of the investment would be $104,973.47 - $100,000 = $4,973.47. Since the NPV is positive, the investment would be considered to be a good one.
The net present value (NPV) model is a widely used financial tool for evaluating investments, but it does have some limitations that should be considered when using it:
Despite these limitations, the NPV model is still a useful tool for investors, as it provides a systematic way to compare the expected returns of different investments and to make informed decisions about which investments are likely to be the most profitable. However, it is important to use the NPV model in conjunction with other tools and techniques, and to be aware of its limitations when making investment decisions.